Facebook Icon Twitter Icon YouTube Icon Google Plus Icon LinkedIn Icon

A Decision by a Heart & Lung Arbitrator is Not Binding in a Workers’ Comp Proceeding.

April 3rd, 2017

In Merrell v. WCAB, 2017 WL 1210197 (April 3, 2017), the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court held that a decision by a Heart & Lung  arbitrator that a claimant was disabled and thus entitled to Heart & Lung benefits was not binding on the Workers’ Compensation Judge.

The Commonwealth Court held that there is a two part inquiry when considering whether Collateral Estoppel applies to a Workers’ Comp proceeding; the amount of risk and the governing procedures in the two proceedings.  The Commonwealth Court held that the amount of risk involved in a Heart & Lung arbitration and a workers’ compensation proceeding are substantially different because Heart & Lung benefits cease once a disability is deemed to be permanent whereas workers’ compensation benefits can last a lifetime.

In addition, the court held that the procedures in a Heart & Lung arbitration are much less formal, and therefore substantially different than a workers’ compensation proceeding.  Opinion by Leavitt, P.J.

 

I was referred to Freeburn Law by a friend. When I called, I was connected to Steve Schneider. I was a wreck because I had never been in this situation before and was totally clueless where to turn for help. Mr Schneider and Tonya were fabulous. They took me through everything step by step and encouraged me when my spirits drooped. They even made sure no one would take advantage of me once I got my settlement. I would highly recommend this firm. They’re wonderful.

Melinda F.